You are invited to join us on the Chronological Bible journey in 2011!  We currently have over 700 people signed up for our free weekly email filled with commentary, encouragement, and questions for reflection.  To join us on the journey in 2011 click on this link for more details and to sign up!

Genesis 15-17:27
~ Click here to read today’s Scripture on BibleGateway.com ~ // Mobile Site Link

function googleTranslateElementInit() {
new google.translate.TranslateElement({
pageLanguage: ‘en’
}, ‘google_translate_element’);
}
http://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit

Genesis chapter 15:9-21 is the first Abrahamic Covenant.   It was an unconditional divine promise to fulfill the grant of the land to Abram and his descendants.  Verses 5 & 6 in chapter 15 are powerful: “Then the LORD brought Abram outside beneath the night sky and told him, “Look up into the heavens and count the stars if you can. Your descendants will be like that–too many to count!” And Abram believed the LORD, and the LORD declared him righteous because of his faith.”  And verse 6, the preceding sentence to this one I think is important for each of us to consider.  Do we believe God’s promises?  What are God’s promises for us?   Do we have faith that God’s promises for us through his son Jesus are true?  Even if we’ve been walking with faith for a while now – are we still as “on fire” with our faith as we once were?   Can we pray to God to show us his promises anew (or maybe for the first time) for our lives?  Can we pray to God for faith like Abram’s?  It is believed that in the dark night sky of the ancient near east Abram could have seen up to 8,000 stars in the sky.  Perhaps when God said the words above in verses 5 & 6 Abram saw a view of something like this below (image taken from NASA’s Hubble Space telescope of the Sagittarious Star Cloud):

Sagittarius

Today in Genesis chapter 16 we get another potential Jesus sighting in the OT!  🙂  (Similar to our “potential” with Melchizedek yesterday.)   I’ll keep you posted on all our “potential” Jesus sightings in the Old Testament – as seen by some commentaries.  Some believe that the angel that appears to Hagar in the desert could be Christ pre-incarnate.  Why?  Because the angel seems to be speaking in the first person, as if the angel is God – (and Jesus is God) – but yet the angel is not described as God the Father.   Check out verse 10 on this point – “I will give you more descendants than you can count.””  Next point is that later in this chapter Hagar seems to be giving the angel a bit more credit of the angel “just being an angel”, as you’ll see here in verse 13: “Thereafter, Hagar referred to the LORD, who had spoken to her, as “the God who sees me,” for she said, “I have seen the One who sees me!”” I guess I can see how some commentators go down this path…  Whaddya think?   Below is French painter James Tissot’s watercolor “Hagar and the Angel in the Desert” from the year 1896:


Hagar_desert

In Genesis chapter 17 we read about the second Abrahamic Covenant!  This covenant was is a conditional divine pledge from God to be Abraham’s God and the God of his descendents.  The condition?  Obedience and consecration to God as symbolized by circumcision.  In verse 23 I think we see another example of Abraham’s prompt obedience to God’s will for his life: “On that very day Abraham took his son Ishmael and every other male in his household and circumcised them, cutting off their foreskins, exactly as God had told him.”  Abraham does not hesitate – does not wait one more day – he and every other male in his household get circumcised that very day!  Are we prompt with our obedience to God’s will in our lives?  Or do we wait a day to move forward on what God is calling us to do?  Or do we even wait a week?  Or a year?  Or a lifetime?  What is God calling you to do?  Will you be promptly obedient?  Below is a stained glass image from England made in the year 1435 showing God giving this covenant to Abraham:


Godscovenantwithabraham

Bible.org’s commentary on today’s readings in Genesis titled “The Focal Point of Abram’s Faith” is at this link and “Grasping the Great Truth of God” is at this link.

Worship God:  Today’s readings in Genesis 15:5 with God showing Abram the stars reminded me of The Afters song “Light Up the Sky:”


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UpWVQbbKVo

Has God lit up the sky for you?  Click here for God’s Light of the World!

Please join us in memorizing and meditating on a verse of Scripture today: “Abram believed the LORD, and he credited it to him as righteousness.” Genesis 15:6 NIV

Prayer Point: Pray that like Abram, you believe in the Lord. Pray that like Abram, you have faith. Pray that through your saving faith in Jesus, Christ’s righteousness will be credited to you forevermore.

Comments from You and Question of the Day: Has God ever shown Himself to you through His creation, as He did to Abram in Genesis chapter 15? Has His creation ever increased your faith? Also, what verses or insights stand out to you in today’s readings?  Please post up by clicking on the “Comments” link below!

God bless,
Mike

Posted in

4 responses to “January 5th Chronological Bible Readings”

  1. John Avatar
    John

    The Angel of the Lord
    Hebrew word for angel – “mlak” means messenger. Who is this messenger of the Lord? An angel, a special angel, God, Jesus? there is much discussion on this topic.
    The actual Hebrew is “mlak ieue” translated messenger of Yahweh. Whoa there is no “the”. What gives?
    Two Hebrew rules of grammar:
    “In Hebrew the definiteness of a noun and that of its modifiers are in agreement.”
    “If the genitive is definite, the phrase is definite; the genitive may be definite because it bears the article or a suffix or because it is a name.”
    In this case both the rules are in agreement on these words:
    “So, in our case, with ‘angel of YHWH’, if YHWH is definite, then angel is definite (i.e., ‘the angel’ in English).”
    “Since YHWH is treated as a proper name in the OT (and sometimes like a title), it is always definite as ‘intrinsically definite’ (Waltke/O’Connor, section 13.4a). This would mean that ANYTIME you see ‘malik YHWH’ it is to be translated as “THE angel of YHWH” or “THE angel of THE LORD” (both definite).”
    http://www.christian-thinktank.com/nothe.html
    So “the angel of the Lord” is a correct translation.
    ====================================================== The angel of the Lord has three interesting clues regarding identity in the passage with Hagar.
    1) 10 “The angel added, “I will so increase your descendants…” It doesn’t say ‘the Lord says, I will… The angel says “he” will increase.
    2) 11″…for the LORD has heard of your misery.” Refers to the Lord as another person.
    3)13 “She gave this name to the LORD who spoke to her:…” The author says the speaker is God.
    So, the angel of the Lord speaks with authority, refers to the Lord, and is the Lord?
    This is great stuff for skeptics, and big headache for Jewish rabbis. However it is easily resolved if you believe in the Trinity. The angel of the Lord is Jesus Christ. He is God and can speak authoratatively, He can refer to the Father in heaven, and Jesus is God.
    In the OT the Son and the Father may not be used, but the roles in the Trinity have never changed. (God is immutable). Jesus while equal has always deferred to the Father (in the same way that wives while equal to the husband defer to the husband in NT), and would certainly agree to come down and visit Hagar.
    In addition, I believe, that “the angel of the Lord” is a TITLE. Jesus is the pre-eminent messenger of the Lord. If you do a word search and look at the Hebrew for angel in OT, you will see that introducing an angel or referring to an angel never takes the construct like “the angel of the Lord”

    Hope this gives you something to think about.

    Circumcision: Only one day Scientifically the Best day to perform procedure.
    “Among the intriguing proofs of the Bible’s inspiration is its unique scientific foreknowledge. From anthropology to zoology, the Bible presents astonishingly accurate scientific information that the writers, on their own, simply could not have known.”
    DAY EIGHT is the perfect day to perform a surgery on an infant. How so?
    “In humans, blood clotting is dependent upon three factors: (a) platelets; (b) vitamin K; and (c) prothrombin. In 1935, professor H. Dam proposed the name “vitamin K” for the factor that helped prevent hemorrhaging in chicks. We now realize that vitamin K is responsible for the production (by the liver) of prothrombin. If vitamin K is deficient, there will be a prothrombin deficiency and hemorrhaging may occur.
    Interestingly, it is only on the fifth to seventh days of a newborn’s life that vitamin K (produced by the action of bacteria in the intestinal tract) is present in adequate quantities. Vitamin K—coupled with prothrombin—causes blood coagulation, which is important in any surgical procedure.
    On the eighth day, the amount of prothrombin present actually is elevated above 100 percent of normal. In fact, day eight is the only day in the male’s life in which this will be the case under normal conditions. If surgery is to be performed, day eight is the perfect day to do it.”
    All quotes come from this foot-noted link:
    http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2467
    How did the Hebrews know to perform circumsion on the ABSOLUTE best day to perform surgery on an infant? When the information would not be available until 1,000’s of years later? If you are a skeptic, I guess you would say “lucky guess”. If you are a believer you know it is because the instruction came from a perfect God who knows all.
    Hope you enjoyed and were inspired by this info as much as I was when discovering these facts.

    Like

  2. Beth Avatar
    Beth

    I just like that He is the God who sees. Praise Him!!

    Like

  3. CHARLOTTE WILLSON Avatar

    Has God ever shown Himself to you through His creation, as He did to Abram in Genesis chapter 15?
    I DON’T THINK SO
    Has His creation ever increased your faith?
    AGAIN I DON’T THINK SO
    Also, what verses or insights stand out to you in today’s readings?
    HERE IS ONE? MORE BECAUSE I DON’T UNDERSTAND…
    SO IF A CHILD NOW A DAYS IS NOT CIRCUMCISED BECAUSE HIS PARENTS DID NOT HAVE HIM….MUST HE BE CIRCUMCISED TO BE SAVED?????????????????
     14And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.
    Well off to do todays reading and i will be caught up…..I am going to do this!I CAN READ THE ENTIRE BIBLE.

    Like

  4. Brenda Avatar
    Brenda

    Hi Charlotte, the question you asked about does a person have to be circumcised to be saved, the answer is no. That was under the old covenant. That question was answered between the Apostle Paul and Peter. Gentiles did not have to get the physical circumcision of the foreskin but the Holy Spirit and salvation brought the circumcision of the heart. Through his blood you are saved when you give your life to Jesus. However, I circumcised all of my boys because of cleanliness and to eliminate room for infections. There are certain religions that do however require circumcision and that is ok.

    Like

Leave a comment